Services for Organizations

Using our research, best practices and expertise, we help you understand how to optimize your business processes using applications, information and technology. We provide advisory, education, and assessment services to rapidly identify and prioritize areas for improvement and perform vendor selection

Consulting & Strategy Sessions

Ventana On Demand

    Services for Investment Firms

    We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.

    Consulting & Strategy Sessions

    Ventana On Demand

      Services for Technology Vendors

      We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.

      Analyst Relations

      Demand Generation

      Product Marketing

      Market Coverage

      Request a Briefing

        Ventana Research Analyst Perspectives

        << Back to Blog Index

        Streaming Databases Enable Continuous Analysis and Data Persistence

        Success with streaming data and events requires a more holistic approach to managing and governing data in motion and data at rest. The use of streaming data and event processing has been part of the data landscape for many decades. For much of that time, data streaming was a niche activity, however, with standalone data streaming and event-processing projects run in parallel with existing batch-processing initiatives, utilizing operational and analytic data platforms. I noted that there has been an increased focus on unified approaches that enable the holistic management and governance of data in motion alongside data at rest. One example is the recent emergence of streaming databases designed to combine the incremental processing capabilities of stream-processing engines with the SQL-based analysis and persistence capabilities of traditional databases.

        Ventana Research’s Streaming Data Dynamic Insights enables organizations to assess their relative maturity in achieving value from streaming data. Data from Ventana Research’s Analytics and Data Benchmark Research Ventana_Research_Benchmark_Research_Streaming_Confidence (1)indicates that there are distinct benefits for organizations utilizing streaming data. As might be expected, organizations making use of event-streaming technologies are more confident in their ability to analyze data in motion. Almost two-thirds of organizations (64%) in production with event-streaming technologies are confident in their ability to analyze high-velocity data, compared to less than one-half of organizations (43%) that are not in production with event streaming. Additionally, organizations utilizing event-streaming technologies also have greater confidence in their ability to analyze large volumes of data, as well as their ability to analyze the variety of data needed to make informed business decisions. However, even amongst organizations that are making good use of streaming data and events, many are doing so via initiatives that are separate from traditional data platforms designed to support the batch processing of transactional data, which can result in silos of batch and stream data that then need to be combined and integrated to provide a holistic view. This is not the most efficient way to manage data related to an organization, particularly given the increased importance of streaming data produced by various use cases, including real-time e-commerce and internet of things (IoT).

        Stream-processing systems have, to date, primarily been used for ingestion of streaming data and events and streaming analytics. Streaming data ingestion enables event data to be cleaned and transformed as it is ingested, while streaming analytics allows users to query the event data in flight, enabling low-latency continuous analysis of data as it is generated. In both cases, once processed, the historical event data can then be stored in an external, relational or non-relational data platform for batch processing and analysis as well as integration with transactional data. Streaming analytics provides a real-time view, and batch processing provides a historical view. If an organization is to gain a complete picture, batch and streaming analytics need to be combined. A prime example is combining transactional and user behavior data to fully understand customer behavior in an online retail environment. Our research leads us to assert that, by 2025, more than 7 in 10 organizations’ standard information architectures will include streaming data and event processing, allowing organizations to be more responsive and provide better customer experiences. The emergence of a new breed of streaming databases could improve operational inefficiencies compared to approaches that rely on separate platforms for stream and batch processing. Streaming databases, including the likes of Confluent ksqlDB, DeltaStream, Materialize, RisingWave and Timeplus, are designed to continually process streams of event data using SQL queries and real-time materialized views and also persist historical event data for further analysis. Unlike streaming compute engines that persist the data in an external database, streaming databases are designed to provide native processing and persistence. As such, a single streaming database could be used as an alternative to a combination of (for example) Apache Flink and Apache Cassandra, reducing deployment, configuration, integration and management complexity.

        I recently wrote about how real-time analytic data platforms could be used to develop and support data-intensive operational applications requiring sub-second latency. Streaming databases serve a similar purpose, with latencyVentana_Research_2023_Assertion_StreamingData_Investigate_Database_Products_61_S in the milliseconds. For use cases requiring query response times in the hundreds of milliseconds, either approach could theoretically fit the bill. However, the two technologies remain differentiated by their respective approaches to data processing and persistence. In an analytic database, the data is ingested and stored prior to the batch execution of analytic queries. These queries could be performed with sub-second latency, and therefore deliver “real-time” performance from the perspective of the user, but they still occur after the data is ingested and stored. In comparison, streaming databases perform incremental processing and analysis of the ingested data prior to it being stored. As such, while real-time analytic databases can be used to answer a query in real time, providing a snapshot of the data at the time of the query, streaming databases enable the data to be queried continuously as new data is added, providing a constantly updated, real-time view that is triggered by the ingestion of new data and could therefore be described as truly data-driven. The use of these streaming databases is nascent, but I assert that by 2026, more than one-half of organizations will investigate the use of streaming database products to develop and support real-time applications based on streaming data and events.

        Stream and batch processing both have advantages that lend themselves to specific use cases with different performance requirements. As such, they will continue to co-exist. However, there are also potential advantages to be had from unification. Organizations should evaluate vendors on their ability to deliver on a combination of those capabilities, whether delivered as one product or several products. I recommend that the potential use cases for streaming databases should be part of that evaluation process.


        Matt Aslett


        Matt Aslett
        Director of Research, Analytics and Data

        Matt Aslett leads the software research and advisory for Analytics and Data at Ventana Research, now part of ISG, covering software that improves the utilization and value of information. His focus areas of expertise and market coverage include analytics, data intelligence, data operations, data platforms, and streaming and events.


        Our Analyst Perspective Policy

        • Ventana Research’s Analyst Perspectives are fact-based analysis and guidance on business, industry and technology vendor trends. Each Analyst Perspective presents the view of the analyst who is an established subject matter expert on new developments, business and technology trends, findings from our research, or best practice insights.

          Each is prepared and reviewed in accordance with Ventana Research’s strict standards for accuracy and objectivity and reviewed to ensure it delivers reliable and actionable insights. It is reviewed and edited by research management and is approved by the Chief Research Officer; no individual or organization outside of Ventana Research reviews any Analyst Perspective before it is published. If you have any issue with an Analyst Perspective, please email them to

        View Policy

        Subscribe to Email Updates

        Posts by Month

        see all

        Posts by Topic

        see all

        Analyst Perspectives Archive

        See All