You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘NICE Systems’ tag.


Back in 2007 when NICE Systems acquired Actimize I wondered how long it would be before someone figured out how to use the company’s fraud detection systems in contact centers. The answer is now, as NICE Systems announces its Contact Center Fraud Prevention system.

The original Actimize system used artificial intelligence techniques to track potential fraudulent financial transactions. It works by tracking financial transactions and consulting rules, including user, origin and transaction pattern information, to identify transactions that fall outside the rules. It can flag these suspicious transactions and create alerts so a transaction can be stopped and someone can investigate.

The new contact center system works on similar principles. It begins by using voice biometrics to create a voice profile of callers, combining physical and behavioral factors to create a unique and content-independent voice pattern for each individual. It then uses real-time voice recognition to match a caller to a list of suspects on a watch list. It uses a combination of speech analytics, emotion detection, speech patterns and information captured at the agent’s desktop (such as customer ID, past interactions and topic of call) to determine a risk score for the interaction. This is then combined with contextual data (such as calling number, IVR responses and origin of call) to assess the risk of the call. Calls at risk are processed by the rules engine, which can alert the agent or other individual of the potential risk and say what action to take. It also creates a fraud case that can be used to manage further investigation.

The same process can be used to make the caller authentication process more efficient and effective. Real-time voice recognition can match the caller’s voice profile to a list of stored profiles, and if a match is found (and the caller has not been identified as someone at risk) then the call can be allowed to progress. If no match is found then the system can use other forms of analytics on call information and previous transaction data to determine the next action for the agent. Trials indicate a success rate greater than 95 percent, so such a process can speed up authentication, make it more secure and improve the customer experience.

The interesting thing about fraud is no one ever knows how bad it is until it is detected. This new product from NICE Systems allows organizations to begin this investigation and where needed put in place new processes to reduce potential risks. Two potential downsides of the software are getting it wrong and annoying genuine callers, and possibly falling foul of regulations. However, used with these potential pitfalls in mind, the Contact Center Fraud Prevention system offers organizations the opportunity to close a door before issues occur. I recommend companies investigate whether their business justifies the use of such a system.

Regards,

Richard J. Snow

VP & Research Director


Recently I read that each person has an average of 1.8 devices connected to the Internet, and this number is likely to grow as people continue to buy smartphones and tablets. In parallel, the number of apps available in the various app stores is growing exponentially, with the iPhone store alone having more than 700,000 active apps. The big question for me is how much of this is about business and how much is purely social. Recently Genesys, Interactive Intelligence, Jacada, mplsystems and NICE Systems made announcements showing they are banking on a greater portion being about business, as they all released tools that allow organizations to build what they call mobile customer service apps.

What is a mobile customer service app? As I explained during a recent webinar, it is an evolution from early times when all consumers could do was to use their favorite search engine on a mobile device to access an organization’s website. This had its limitations, not least from an accessibility point of view, and so provided very limited customer service capabilities, often limited to viewing FAQs. Next came what I call the business-specific app; for example a banking app produced by a bank that allows its customers to carry out a limited number of transactions: look up the balance of an account, for instance, or make a payment. While these advance mobile customer service, they have their limitations too, which boil down to the fact that if a transaction goes wrong the only option is to leave the app, call the contact center and start the process over again.

The latest developments aim to overcome both of these sets of limitations. They include a “click to call” icon, which allows consumers to reach the contact center without leaving the app. This means organizations can bypass IVR because the system is smart enough to recognize the caller, passing data already collected in the app to the person handling the interaction so the caller doesn’t have to start again, and giving the agent a running start in handling the interaction. If the caller wants or there is no agent available, the software can enable a callback to fit the caller’s circumstances. The most innovative of the tools allow developers to take advantage of the latest mobile device features such as touch screen data input, integration with GPS data and sharing of all forms of data, such as pictures or video. This combination of features should enhance the customer experience and contact center operations.

I say “should” because as with most innovative technologies I have my reservations as to whether they will gain wide adoption and indeed live up to customer expectations. The first challenge is for companies to choose the right app and include the right capabilities. The whole point of any app is customer use; if customers don’t use it or use it only a few times then it is unlikely to have a major impact. From the roundtables I chair at Directors’ Club customer experience days I know that many companies are struggling to see where they can mobilize their business. The discussions illustrate that companies need to think outside the box to identify what to do; quite often other members of the discussion give participants ideas they hadn’t dreamed of. A few of the discussions identified another best practice – design the app from the customer’s perspective, not the company’s. One of the most successful cases I heard came from two IT guys who developed an app for fun and designed it with what they would like to do in mind. Eventually, without any promotion, it garnered 10,000 downloads, and apparently their company is now hooked on mobile apps.

The use of smart mobile devices is increasing, and the use of mobile customer service apps will increase along with it. However, in these early days, companies need to get things right in order to avoid another version of “everyone hates IVR” with “everyone hating mobile apps.”  I’m interested in the experiences you and your company are having with mobile apps; please come and collaborate with us.

Regards,

Richard J. Snow

VP & Research Director

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 73 other followers

Twitter Updates

Top Rated

Blog Stats

  • 46,153 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 73 other followers

%d bloggers like this: