Services for Organizations

Using our research, best practices and expertise, we help you understand how to optimize your business processes using applications, information and technology. We provide advisory, education, and assessment services to rapidly identify and prioritize areas for improvement and perform vendor selection

Consulting & Strategy Sessions

Ventana On Demand

    Services for Investment Firms

    We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.

    Consulting & Strategy Sessions

    Ventana On Demand

      Services for Technology Vendors

      We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.

      Analyst Relations

      Demand Generation

      Product Marketing

      Market Coverage

      Request a Briefing


        Ventana Research Analyst Perspectives

        << Back to Blog Index

        Companies Miss the Point of Voice of the Customer (VOC)

        The majority of companies think it is important to collect customer feedback, according to my recent research into customer feedback management, and they put that feedback to an average of five uses, the top five of which are to improve customer service (75%), to develop customer experience and interaction processes (54%), to identify agent training needs (54%), to improve products (50%) and to create a customer service strategy (49%).

        However, the research shows several flaws in the way feedback is collectedvr_cfm_how_is_customer_feedback_analyzed and used. As I pointed out in a previous blog post, the majority of companies stick with old ways of collecting feedback. Most use surveys in one form or another, sent out through traditional channels: email, post, the Web. Completion rates are fairly low, and the insights are reduced even further because the process of analyzing the results is largely manual, and thus subjective. Only a minority of innovative companies have automated the process and assess non-survey-based feedback from customers (recorded calls, free-form text such as emails, letters, chat and web scripts, mobile phone text messages and social media) using analytics tools. Such tools allow companies to gain insights from far greater volumes of data and to define rules so that the assessment is consistent across all forms of input.

        vr_cfm_collection_of_customer_feedbackUsing these tools also overcomes another significant weakness in the current process. The current practice of relying on surveys means the majority (52%) of companies select who to survey at random, and few (39%) set up a process to survey customers on a regular basis. This leaves the process open to bias and means companies are potentially making decisions based on the views of a distorted group. For example, it is not uncommon for companies to survey customers who complain, or to select only a few representatives from a single channel of communication (callers to the contact center). We recommend companies instead create a rules-based process that selects a wider representation of customers and determines when surveys are sent out, and that they examine how speech, text and social media analytics tools can extract insight from larger, more diverse forms of feedback.

        The research also highlights one further weakness. The main uses companies make of feedback are inward-looking: improving processes, products, service and training.vr_cfm_who_takes_action_on_customer_feedback The results show that only 34 percent always respond to customers, 46 percent respond sometimes, 16 percent occasionally, and a small percentage (5%) never respond to customers. For those that do respond, the responses are likely to focus on a single issue and be inconsistent, as responsibility is distributed across different lines of business. Such a process is thus unlikely to pick up issues that were created by another line of business; for example, is not untypical for customer to complain about responses from contact center agents when an issue was created by a bad back-office process such as the wrong product being sent out, bills being wrong, or user guides being inadequate. We therefore recommend that feedback be assessed centrally and actions be decided based on consolidated feedback from as large a sample of customers as possible.

        Voice of the customer (VOC) is a hot topic of conversation, although analyzing results from several of my benchmark studies suggests it is not interpreted consistently. For me it needs to be a joined-up process: collect feedback from as large and wide selection of customers as possible, use all forms of feedback, not just surveys, automate the analysis process using tools that can gain insight from unstructured forms of feedback, share the information across all lines of business, and above all let customers know what action you take as a result of their feedback – after all, companies cannot expect customers to complete surveys if they don’t see any action thereafter.

        Do you have a VOC initiative? If so please tell us more and collaborate with me on this topic.

        Regards,

        Richard J. Snow

        VP & Research Director

        Authors:

        Ventana Research

        Ventana Research, now part of Information Services Group (ISG), is the most authoritative and respected market research and advisory services firm focused on improving business outcomes through optimal use of people, processes, information and technology. Since our beginning, our goal has been to provide insight and expert guidance on mainstream and disruptive technologies. In short, we want to help you become smarter and find the most relevant technology to accelerate your organization's goals.

        JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

        Our Analyst Perspective Policy

        • Ventana Research’s Analyst Perspectives are fact-based analysis and guidance on business, industry and technology vendor trends. Each Analyst Perspective presents the view of the analyst who is an established subject matter expert on new developments, business and technology trends, findings from our research, or best practice insights.

          Each is prepared and reviewed in accordance with Ventana Research’s strict standards for accuracy and objectivity and reviewed to ensure it delivers reliable and actionable insights. It is reviewed and edited by research management and is approved by the Chief Research Officer; no individual or organization outside of Ventana Research reviews any Analyst Perspective before it is published. If you have any issue with an Analyst Perspective, please email them to ChiefResearchOfficer@ventanaresearch.com

        View Policy

        Subscribe to Email Updates

        Posts by Month

        see all

        Posts by Topic

        see all


        Analyst Perspectives Archive

        See All